Migrant Education Debate Tournaments: Situated Learning and Literacies as Access to Dominant Discourses in a Democratic Society

Julie Kay Antilla-Garza

Abstract


Migrant students who participate in Migrant Education debate tournaments access the dominant discourses in a democratic society through situated learning and literacies. The findings in this study reveal that participants learn through apprentice relationships with peers and adults and through the social practice of meaning making. The data of this ethnographic study were collected over two years of regional and state Migrant Education debate tournaments. More than 50 hours of video records of debates, interviews, and setting shots were collected and analyzed using narrative inquiry and constant comparative method.

This study contributes a greater understanding of the functions of the Migrant Education debate tournaments. Furthermore, it is hoped that the findings from this study will be used in future determinations of state and federal support for the Migrant Education Program (MEP) in general and for the Migrant Education debate tournaments specifically.

 


Keywords


Migrant Education Program, Scholastic Debates, High School, Situated Learning, Communities of Practice, Literacies

Full Text:

PDF

References


American Psychological Association (2010). Publication manual of the American psychological association, sixth edition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres & other late essays. (Vern W. McGee, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.

Bartolomé, L. I., & Balderrama, M. V. (2001). The need for educators with political and ideological clarity: Providing our children with “The Best.” In M. Reyes & J. J. Halcón (Eds.), The best for our children: Critical perspectives on literacy for Latino students (pp. 48-64). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Broda-Bahm, K., Kempf, D., & Driscoll, W. (2004). Argument and audience: Presenting debates in public settings. New York: International Debate Education Association.

Bucholtz, M. (2010). White kids: Language, race, and styles of youth identity. Cambridge University Press.

Caine, V., Estefan, A., & Clandinin, D. J. (2013). A return to methodological commitment: Reflections on narrative inquiry. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 57(6), 574-586.

Cazden, C. (2012). A framework for social justice in education. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 1(3), 178-198.

Clandinin, D. J. (2006). Narrative inquiry: A methodology for studying lived experience. Research studies in music education, 27(1), 44-54.

Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Coe, R. J. (2012). Conducting your research. In J. Arthur, M. Waring, R. Coe, & L. Hedges (Eds.) Research Methods and Methodologies in Education. Los Angeles: SAGE.

Coffey, A. & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

Comber, M. K. (2003). Civics curriculum and civic skills: Recent evidence. The Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement (CIRCLE). Retrieved June 2, 2013, from http://www. civicyouth.org/PopUps/FactSheets/FS_Civics_Curriculum_Skills.pdf.

Cook-Gumperz, J. (2006). Literacy and Schooling: An unchanging equation? Studies in International Sociolinguistics, 25, 19-36.

Cope, B. & Kalantzis, M. (2009). “Multiliteracies”: New literacies, new learning. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4(3), 164-195.

Delpit, L. (1995). Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York: The New Press.

Du Bois, J. W. (1991). Transcription design principles for spoken discourse research. Pragmatics, 1(1), 71-106.

Fraser, N. (1997). Justice interruptus: Critical reflections on the" postsocialist" condition. New York: Routledge.

Fraser, N. (2000). Rethinking recognition. New Left Review, 3, 1-8.

Fraser, N. (2003). Social justice in the age of identity politics: Redistribution, recognition, and participation. In N. Fraser & A. Honneth (Eds.) Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange. London: Verso.

Freeman, M., Preissle, J., Roulston, K., & St. Pierre, E. A.(2007). Standards of evidence in qualitative research: An incitement to discourse. Educational Researcher, 36(1), 25-32.

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed, (Myra Bergman Ramos, Trans.). New York: Continuum.

Gee, J. P. (2004). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. New York: Routledge.

Gee, J. P. (2012). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses, fourth edition. New York: Routledge.

Glaser, B. G. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12(4), 436-445.

Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. SAGE Publications, Incorporated.

Lankshear, C. & Knobel, M. (2011). Literacies: Social, cultural and historical perspectives. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

Larson, C. L. & Murtadha, K. (2002). Leadership for social justice. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 10(1), 134-161.

Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Legislative Analyst’s Office (2006). Improving Services for Migrant Students. Retrieved from

http://www.lao.ca.gov/2006/migrant_ed/migrant_education_021506.htm

North, C. E. (2006). More than words? Delving into the substantive meaning(s) of “social justice” in education. Review of Educational Research, 76, 507-535.

Parker, W. C. (2003). Teaching democracy: Unity and diversity in public life. New York: Teachers College Press.

Perry, K. H. (2012). What is literacy? – A critical overview of sociocultural perspectives. Journal of Language & Literacy Education, 8(1), 50-71.

Purcell-Gates, V. (2002). “…As soon as she opened her mouth!”: Issues of language, literacy, and power. In L. Delpit (Ed.), The skin that we speak: Thoughts on language and culture in the classroom 121-144). New York, NY: The New Press.

Purcell-Gates, V., Jacobson, E., & Degener, S. (2004). Print Literacy Development: Uniting Cognitive and Social Practice Theories. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Spradley, J. (1979). The ethnographic interview. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.

Street, B. V. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice, vol. 9. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Street, B. V. (1993). The new literacy studies, guest editorial. Journal of Research in Reading, 16(2), 81-97.

Street, B. V. (1995). Social literacies: Critical approaches to literacy in development, ethnography, and education. London: Longman.

Street, B. (1997). The implications of the ‘new literacy studies’ for literacy education. English in Education, 31(3), 45-59.

Street, B. (1998). New literacies in theory and practice: What are the implications for language in education? Linguistics and Education, 10(1), 1-24.

Street, B. (2003). What’s “new” in new literacy studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5(2), 77-91.

Street, B. (2005). At last: Recent applications of new literacy studies in educational contexts. Research in the Teaching of English, 39(4), 417-423.

Street, B. (2005). Literacies across educational contexts: Mediating learning and teaching. Philadelphia: Caslon Publishing.

Teddlie, C. & Tashakkori, A. (2003). Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Toulmin, S. E. (1958/2003). The uses of argument: updated edition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press (1958)/Stephen E. Toulmin (2003).

U.S. Department of Education (2011). Elementary & secondary education part C – Education of migratory children. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/pg8.html

Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language (A. Kozulin, Trans. & Ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

Wenger, E. (2009). Communities of practice: A brief introduction. Retrieved from http://www.ewenger.com/theory/


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.